4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Self-organized lamellar structured tantalum-nitride by UHV unbalanced-magnetron sputtering

Journal

THIN SOLID FILMS
Volume 475, Issue 1-2, Pages 45-48

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2004.07.070

Keywords

TaN; sputtering; lamellar; stress; hardness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of crystal orientation and microstructure on the mechanical properties of TaN, was investigated. TAN, films were grown on a SiO2 substrate by ultrahigh vacuum unbalanced magnetron sputter deposition in mixed Ar/N-2 discharges at 20 mTorr (2.67 Pa) and at 350 degreesC. Unlike the Ti-N system, in which TiN is the terminal phase, a large number of N-rich phases in the Ta-N system could lead to layers which had self-organized nanosized lamella structure of coherent cubic and hexagonal phases, with a correct choice of nitrogen fraction in the sputtering mixture and ion irradiation energy during growth. The preferred orientations and the microstructure of TaNx layers were controlled by varying incident ion energy E-i (=30 50 eV) and nitrogen fractions f(N2), (=0.1-0.15). TaNx layers were grown on (0002)-Ti underlayer as a crystallographic template in order to relieve the stress on the films. The structure of the TaNx film transformed from Bl-NaCl delta-TaNx to lamellar structured Bl-NaCl delta-TaNx+hexagonal epsilon-TAN(x) or Bl-NaCl delta-TAN(x)+hexagonal gamma-TaNx with increasing ion energy at the same nitrogen fraction f(N2). The hardness of the films also increased by the structural change. At the nitrogen fraction of 0.1-0.125, the structure of the TaNx films was changed from delta-TAN(x)+epsilon-TaNx to delta-TaNx+gamma-TaNx with increasing ion energy. However, at the nitrogen fraction of 0.15, the film structure did not change from delta-TaNx+epsilon-TaNx over the whole range of the applied ion energy. The hardness increased significantly from 21.1 to 45.5 GPa with increasing ion energy. (C) 2004 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available