4.6 Article

Limitation of Infarct Size and No-Reflow by Intracoronary Adenosine Depends Critically on Dose and Duration

Journal

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS
Volume 8, Issue 15, Pages 1990-1999

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.08.033

Keywords

acute myocardial infarction; adenosine; no-reflow; reperfusion injury

Funding

  1. Cordis Corporation
  2. Johnson & Johnson Company
  3. Abbott Vascular
  4. Boston Scientific

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES In the absence of effective clinical pharmacotherapy for prevention of reperfusion-mediated injury, this study re-evaluated the effects of intracoronary adenosine on infarct size and no-reflow in a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction using clinical bolus and experimental high-dose infusion regimens. BACKGROUND Despite the clear cardioprotective effects of adenosine, when administered prior to ischemia, studies on cardioprotection by adenosine when administered at reperfusion have yielded contradictory results in both pre-clinical and clinical settings. METHODS Swine (54 +/- 1 kg) were subjected to a 45-min mid-left anterior descending artery occlusion followed by 2 h of reperfusion. In protocol A, an intracoronary bolus of 3 mg adenosine injected over 1 min (n = 5) or saline (n = 10) was administered at reperfusion. In protocol B, an intracoronary infusion of 50 mu g/kg/min adenosine (n = 15) or saline (n = 21) was administered starting 5 min prior to reperfusion and continued throughout the 2-h reperfusion period. RESULTS In protocol A, area-at-risk, infarct size, and no-reflow were similar between groups. In protocol B, risk zones were similar, but administration of adenosine resulted in significant reductions in infarct size from 59 +/- 3% of the area-at- risk in control swine to 46 +/- 4% (p = 0.02), and no-reflow from 49 +/- 6% of the infarct area to 26 +/- 6% (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS During reperfusion, intracoronary adenosine can limit infarct size and no-reflow in a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction. However, protection was only observed when adenosine was administered via prolonged high-dose infusion, and not via short-acting bolus injection. These findings warrant reconsideration of adenosine as an adjuvant therapy during early reperfusion. (C) 2015 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available