4.7 Article

Strontium isotope constraints on fluid flow in the upper oceanic crust at the East Pacific Rise

Journal

EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 232, Issue 1-2, Pages 83-94

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.01.008

Keywords

strontium isotopes; hydrothermal circulation; fluid-flux; Hess Deep; East Pacific Rise

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Strontium isotopes are useful tracers of fluid-rock interaction in marine hydrothermal systems and provide a potential way to quantify the amount of seawater that passes through these systems. We have determined the whole-rock Sr-isotopic compositions of a section of upper oceanic crust that formed at the fast-spreading East Pacific Rise, now exposed at Hess Deep. This dataset provides the first detailed comparison for the much-studied Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) drill core from Site 504B. Whole-rock and mineral Sr concentrations indicate that Sr-exchange between hydrothermal fluids and the oceanic crust is complex, being dependent on the mineralogical reactions occurring-, in particular, epidote formation takes up Sr from the fluid increasing the Sr-87/Sr-86 of the bulk-rock. Calculating the fluid-flux required to shift the Sr-isotopic composition of the Hess Deep sheeted-dike complex, using the approach of Bickle and Teagle [1] [M.J. Bickle, DA.H. Teagle, Strontium alteration in the Troodos ophiolite: implications for fluid fluxes and geochemical transport in mid-ocean ridge hydrothermal systems. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 113 (1992) 219-237] gives a fluid-flux similar to that determined for CDP Hole 504B. This suggests that the level of isotopic exchange observed in these two regions is probably typical for modem oceanic crust. Unfortunately, uncertainties in the modeling approach do not allow us to determine a fluid-flux that is directly comparable to fluxes calculated by other methods. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available