4.7 Article

Clomethiazole: mechanisms underlying lasting neuroprotection after hypoxia-ischemia

Journal

FASEB JOURNAL
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages 1036-+

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1096/fj.04-3367fje

Keywords

hippocampus; NOS; diaschisis; electrophysiology; arginase

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Damage after hypoxia-ischemia (HI) is observed in both cortical and subcortical regions. In this study. we employed a Levine rat model of HI (left carotid ligation + 1 h global hypoxia on PND-26) and used histological and electrophysiological paradigms to assess the long-term neuroprotective properties of clomethiazole (CMZ; a GABA(A) receptor modulator). Key enzymes involved in inflammation, namely nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and arginase, were also examined to assess potential CMZ mechanisms not involving GABA-R activation. Assessments were carried out 3 and 90 days post-HI. Extensive CNS lesions were evident after HI ipsilaterally at both short- and long-term intervals. CMZ significantly decreased the lesion size at 3 and 90 days (P < 0.01; P < 0.05). Evoked field potential analysis were used to assess hippocampal CA1 neuronal acitivity ex vivo. Electrophysiological measurements contralateral to the occlusion revealed impaired neuronal function after HI relative to short- long-term controls (P < 0.01, 3 and 14 days; P < 0.01, 90 days), with CMZ treatment providing near complete protection (P < 0.001 at 3 and 14 days; P < 0.01 at 90 days). Both NOS and arginase activities were significantly increased at 3 days (P < 0.01), with arginase remaining elevated at 90 days post-HI (P < 0.05) ipsilaterally. CMZ suppressed the HI-induced increase in iNOS and arginase activities (P 0.001; P < 0.05). These data provide evidence of long-term functional neuroprotection by CMZ in a model of HI. We further conclude that under conditions of HI, functional deficits are not restricted to the ipsilateral hemisphere and are due, at least in part, to changes in the activity of NOS and arginase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available