4.7 Article

The interpretation of nucleic acid amplification tests for tuberculosis: do rapid tests change treatment decisions?

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages 187-192

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2004.03.010

Keywords

tuberculosis; tuberculosis/diagnosis; nucleic acid amplification techniques; sensitivity and specificity; predictive value of tests

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. To describe changes in treatment decisions after receipt of nucleic acid amplification (NAA) test for the diagnosis of A tuberculosis. Methods. Retrospective notes review of treatment decisions in patients receiving a NAA test for suspected pulmonary or non-pulmonary tuberculosis at the Royal Free Hospital in London between March 2001 and February 2002. Notes were sought on a 50% random sample of patients with both smear and NAA negative specimens and at patients with other specimen results. Results. Two hundred and fifty patients were tested with NAA; clinical details were obtained on 138; 61 were ever treated. Seventeen (17/18) smear-negative patients were started on treatment after a positive NAA; none of six smear-negative patients treated prior to a negative NAA result had treatment stopped. Seventeen (17/21) smear-positive patients were treated prior to NAA result and all were NAA positive; treatment was delayed in four smear-positive patients until receipt of an NAA and one NAA-negative patient was not treated. Conclusions. In routine practice a positive test in an untreated smear-negative patient leads to decision to treat in almost all, but the proportion testing positive is low (8% or 17/219). In patients already on treatment negative tests did not lead to decisions to stop. (c) 2004 The British Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available