4.7 Article

The stellar populations of the M31 halo substructure

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 622, Issue 2, Pages L109-L112

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/429371

Keywords

galaxies : evolution; galaxies : formation; galaxies : halos; galaxies : individual ( M31); galaxies : stellar content; galaxies : structure

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/C50352X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. STFC [PP/C50352X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the first results from our survey of stellar substructure in the outskirts of M31 using the Advanced Camera for Surveys on board the Hubble Space Telescope. We discuss the stellar populations associated with five prominent stellar overdensities discovered during the course of our panoramic ground-based imaging survey with the Isaac Newton Telescope Wide-Field Camera; a sixth pointing targets a region of clean halo. The color-magnitude diagrams, which contain between approximate to 10,000 and 90,000 stars and reach 4 mag below the horizontal branch, reveal clear variations in morphology between most fields, indicating that the age and/or metallicity mix of stars is not constant at large radius. This directly confirms the existence of large-scale population inhomogeneities within the halo of M31 and lends further support to the notion that M31 has formed, at least in part, through satellite accretions. We find a striking similarity between the populations of the giant stellar stream and those of another overdensity, the NE shelf, which lies northeast of the galaxy center. If these overdensities are associated with the same population, then the difference in their red clump magnitudes implies that the NE shelf lies in front of the stream by several tens of kiloparsecs, in good agreement with recent orbit calculations for the stream progenitor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available