Journal
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
Volume 162, Issue 4, Pages 648-655Publisher
AMER PSYCHIATRIC PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.4.648
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective: The use of the terms mind and brain in psychiatry is often associated with a set of polarities. Concepts such as environment, psychosocial, and psychotherapy are linked with mind, while genes, biology, and medication are often associated with brain. The author examines these dichotomies as they apply to personality disorders. Method: Research on antisocial and borderline personality disorders that is relevant to these dichotomies is evaluated. The implications of the findings for the understanding of pathogenesis and treatment are reconsidered. Results: In the clinical setting, it is problematic to lump together terms such as genes, brain, and biological as though they are separate and distinct from terms such as environment, mind, and psychosocial. These dichotomies are problematic, because genes and environment are inextricably intertwined in the pathogenesis of personality disorders, psychosocial experiences may result in permanent changes in the brain, and psychotherapy may have its effect by altering brain structure and function. The theory of mind is a useful construct for bridging mind and brain in the treatment of personality disorders. Conclusions: Severe personality disorders are best understood and treated without either-or dichotomies of brain and mind. Each domain has a different language, however, and the language of the mind is necessary to help the patient develop a theory of mind.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available