3.8 Article

Value of fluorescence in situ hybridization in the diagnosis and prognosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Journal

CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS
Volume 158, Issue 1, Pages 88-91

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2004.08.012

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most common adult leukemia. Prognosis is related to clinical staging and cytogenetic findings. Conventional cytogenetic analysis of CLL reveals abnormalities in approximately one third of patients. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is analytically more sensitive than conventional cytogenetics for specific chromosomal abnormalities. To evaluate the usefulness of FISH in CLL, a study of 100 CLL patients comparing conventional cytogenetics and a commercially available multiprobe FISH kit was undertaken. One hundred consecutive CLL patients (67 males, 33 females) were studied. The male-female patient ratio was similar to 2.0 to 1. Twenty-eight percent (28/98) of patients had abnormal karyotypes by conventional cytogenetics (one patient had no specimen for conventional cytogenetics and one had an unanalyzable karyotype), and of those 19/100 (19%) had more than one chromosomal abnormality. Sixty-four percent (64/100) of the patients were positive for at least one abnormality by the FISH probes used. The following abnormalities were noted with FISH: 11q22 ATM, 23/100 (23%); trisomy 12, 11/100 (11%); 13q14.3, 40/100 (40%); 13q34.3, 4/100 (4%); 17p13.1, 12/100 (12%). Conventional karyotypes revealed 2 patients with abnormalities of chromosome 6 (which FISH did not address); 11 with abnormalities of 11 or 11q; 6 with trisomy 12; and 4 with abnormalities of 17. Aberrations of 11q and 17p are reported to have a poor prognosis in CLL. FISH can identify abnormalities missed with conventional cytogenetics and is helpful in diagnosis, prognosis, and evaluation of therapy for CLL. Additional chromosomal changes are identified with conventional cytogenetics that are not addressed by the multiprobe FISH kit. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available