4.5 Article

Evaluation of foliar resistance in potato to Phytophthora infestans based on an international field trial network

Journal

PLANT PATHOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages 169-179

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2005.01166.x

Keywords

cultivar ranking; decision support system; disease assessment; partial resistance; potato late blight; Web-Blight

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During the period 2000-03, local potato cultivars in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Denmark were tested for foliar resistance to Phytophthora infestans (late blight) in an international field trial network. Four standard cultivars were included in the trials: Sava, Oleva, Danva and Kuras. Primary disease-assessment data were entered into a common database, and parameters from the disease progress curves were calculated and made available on interactive web pages. A regression model, using relative area under disease progress curve (RAUDPC) values for cv. Oleva as a reference, was developed for the estimation of 1-9 scale values, where 1 = most susceptible. Standard deviations for the estimated 1-9 scale values and a nonparametric rank stability analysis of RAUDPC were used to evaluate the stability of resistance of the cultivars. Overall, the results showed stability of resistance for cvs Sava, Oleva and Danva, but not for Kuras. Use of the Internet-based Web-Blight service in this study facilitated comparison of results among countries for the level and stability of resistance. The estimated 1-9 scale values were similar to, or slightly lower than, those from official cultivar lists or from the European Cultivated Potato Database, especially for the more resistant cultivars. Possible reasons for discrepancies from different sources and locations are discussed. It is concluded that RAUPDC and the derived 1-9 scale values are useful for ranking cultivars for resistance to P. infestans, but this information is not detailed enough for use in a decision support system for late blight control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available