4.5 Article

A common polymorphism in the 3′UTR of cyclooxygenase 2/prostaglandin synthase 2 gene and risk of lung cancer in a Chinese population

Journal

LUNG CANCER
Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages 11-17

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.09.004

Keywords

COX-2; polymorphism; lung cancer; molecular epidemiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cyclooxygenases (COXs) are key enzymes that convert arachidonic acid to prostaglandins. Overexpression of COX-2, one of the COX isozymes, has been shown to be an early event in lung carcinogenesis and may play an important rote in lung cancer development. A common single nucleotide polymorphism, T8473C, located within a potential functional region in the 3'UTR of COX-2 gene was identified and we hypothesized that this COX-2 variant is associated with lung cancer risk. To test this hypothesis, we genotyped this variant in a case-control study of 322 histologically-confirmed lung cancer patients and 323 age and sex frequency-matched cancer-free controls in a Chinese population. The results showed that the frequencies of variant genotypes 8473CT/CC were significantly less common in the cases (27.3%) than in the controls (35.3%) (P=0.034), suggesting that the 8473C allele was protective against lung cancer. Multivariate Logistic regression analyses revealed that the COX-2 variant genotypes (8473CT/CC) were associated with a significantly decreased risk of lung cancer compared with the 8473C wild-type homozygotes (OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.45-0.92). When we defined the reference group as non-smokers having the 8473CT/CC variant genotypes, the smokers with the 8473TT wild-type genotype had the greatest risk (adjusted OR = 5.28, 95% Cl = 3.10-9.00). These findings indicate that the COX-2 T8473C potymorphism may contribute to Lung cancer susceptibility in the Chinese population. Further Larger molecular epidemiological studies are warranted to confirm these findings. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available