4.3 Article

Biochemical characterization of the glucose kinase from Streptomyces coelicolor compared to Streptomyces peucetius var. caesius

Journal

RESEARCH IN MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 156, Issue 3, Pages 361-366

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2004.11.001

Keywords

carbon catabolite repression; glucose kinase; Streptomyces; regulation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glucose kinase (Glk) from Streptomyces coelicolor was purified, characterized biochemically and kinetically, and compared to Glk from Streptomyces peucetius var. caesius. In both Streptomyces, 96% of the enzyme activity was detected in the cytosolic fraction. The use of a Glk activity gel showed no isoforms of the enzyme in extracts from these microorganisms. The purified S. coelicolor Glk was stable in its tetrameric form, unlike the purified enzyme from S. peucetius var. caesius which easily dissociated into dimers. Tetramer dissociation was prevented by 100 MM D-glucose; however, this effect was not observed with other sugars. The optimum pH and the pI are practically identical for both enzymes. Maximum activity was found at a lower temperature for S. coelicolor Glk (33 compared to 42 degrees C) and its activity was apparently less stable at higher temperatures. Its activation energy was also 40% lower than that of S. peucetius var. caesius. The kinetic mechanism appears to follow a rapid equilibrium-ordered Bi-Bi sequential mechanism in both microbial enzymes, where Glk first binds glucose and then the MgATP(2-) complex, to form a ternary complex (enzyme D-glucose-MgATP(-2)). The K-m values for D-glucose and MgATP(2-) were 1.4, 0.5 mM and 1.6, 0.8 mM for the S. coelicolor and S. peucetius var. caesius Glks, respectively. However V-max Of S. coelicolor Glk was higher. In conclusion, the S. coelicolor Glk showed a more stable tetrameric form with better affinity for its substrates and higher Vmax, suggesting greater catalytic efficiency. (c) 2004 Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available