4.5 Article

HER2/neu expression and amplification in non-small cell lung cancer prior to and after neoadjuvant therapy

Journal

LUNG CANCER
Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages 59-67

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.10.010

Keywords

non-small cell lung cancer; neoadjuvant therapy; HER2/neu (p185(neu)); therapy-induced tumor regression; Hercep-Test; FISH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Expression and amplification of the HER2/neu protooncogene was analyzed in locally advanced NSCLC in a multimodality therapy approach in order to obtain information on the predictive value of HER2/neu for success or failure of neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: In the scope of a prospective randomized phase III-trial, tumor tissue of pre-therapeuticalty obtained mediastinal lymph node biopsies (n = 105) and corresponding post-surgical resection specimens (n=44) was analyzed by means of immunohistochemistry (DAKO-Hercep-Test) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). In 58 of 105 patients with metastatic mediastinal lymph node disease the extent of therapy-induced tumor regression could be established. Results: Concerning HER2/neu expression, 16 lymph node biopsies (15.2%) showed 1+, 2+, or 3+ results. Five of these cases revealed amplification in FISH analysis (4.8%). In 44 corresponding resection specimens, Hercep-Test showed 1+, 2+, or 3+ results in 13 tumors (29.5%). Two of these patients revealed HER2/neu amplification in FISH analysis (4.5%). In patients with HER2/neu expressing tumors a trend towards a less extensive therapy-induced tumor regression could be demonstrated. When comparing pre-therapy and post-surgical results, there was a weak trend towards a selection of HER2/neu expressing tumor tissue in the course of neoadjuvant therapy. Conclusions: Only a limited subcollective of locally advanced NSCLC meets the biological requirements for anti-HER2/neu therapy. HER2/neu positive tumors appeared to be relatively resistant to chemotherapy and radiation treatment, none of these cases having a pathological complete or at least subtotal response in the corresponding resection specimens. This observation requires confirmation in large randomized controlled studies. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available