4.7 Article

Detection of entorhinal layer II using tesla magnetic resonance imaging

Journal

ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages 489-494

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ana.20426

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [R01 RR016594, P41 RR006009, R01 RR16594-01A1, S10 RR019307, P41-RR14075, S10 RR023401, P41 RR014075] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [K01 AG028521] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIBIB NIH HHS [T32 EB001680, P41 EB015896, R01 EB006758, U54 EB005149] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS070963, R21 NS072652, R01 NS052585] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The entorhinal cortex lies in the mediotemporal lobe and has major functional, structural, and clinical significance. The entorhinal cortex has a unique cytoarchitecture with large stellate neurons in layer II that form clusters. The entorhinal cortex receives vast sensory association input, and its major output arises from the layer II and III neurons that form the perforant pathway. Clinically, the neurons in layer II are affected with neurofibrillary tangles, one of the two pathological hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease. We describe detection of the entorhinal layer II islands using magnetic resonance imaging. We scanned human autopsied temporal lobe blocks in a 7T human scanner using a solenoid coil. In 70 and 100 mu m isotropic data, the entorhinal islands were clearly visible throughout the anterior-posterior extent of entorhinal cortex. Layer II islands were prominent in both the magnetic resonance imaging and corresponding histological sections, showing similar size and shape in two types of data. Area borders and island location based on cytoarchitectural features in the mediotemporal lobe were robustly detected using the magnetic resonance images. Our ex vivo results could break ground for high-resolution in vivo scanning that could ultimately benefit early diagnosis and treatment of neurodegenerative disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available