4.3 Article

The effects of gender on quadriceps muscle activation strategies during a maneuver that mimics a high ACL injury risk position

Journal

JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 181-189

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2004.08.006

Keywords

anterior cruciate ligament injury; female athlete; medial quadriceps; lateral quadriceps; neuromuscular imbalances; side-step cut

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [R01-AR049735-01/A1] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While the increased incidence of serious knee injuries in female athletes is well established, the underlying neuromuscular mechanisms related to the elevated ACL injury rate has yet to be delineated. Video, analysis of ACL injury during competitive sports play indicates a common body position associated With non-contact ACL injury;the tibia: is externally rotated, the knee is close to full extension, the foot is planted and as the limb is decelerated it collapses into valgus. The purpose of the current prospective study was to evaluate gender differences in quadriceps muscle activation strategies when performing a physically challenging, but reproducible maneuver that mimics the high ACL injury risk: position (in the absence of high velocity and high loads). Twenty physically active college-aged subjects (10 male and 10 female) performed multiple sets of the prescribed exercise. EMG recordings were employed to measure the ratio of activation between the medial and lateral quadriceps during the 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20th sets of exercise. Females demonstrated decreased RMS:medial-to-lateral quadriceps ratios compared to males (F(1, 18) = 5.88, p = 0.026). There was no main effect of. set number on RMS quadriceps ratio (p > 0.05). The results of this study suggest that females utilize neuromuscular activation strategies which may contribute to dynamic valgus and ACL rupture when performing high-risk maneuvers. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available