4.7 Article

Enhanced thermal conductivity of TiO2 -: water based nanofluids

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERMAL SCIENCES
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages 367-373

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2004.12.005

Keywords

nanoparticles; nanofluids; thermal conductivity; hot-wire method

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanofluids are prepared by dispersing TiO2 nanoparticles in rod-shapes of circle divide 10 nm x 40 nm (diameter by length) and in spherical shapes of circle divide 15 nm in deionized water. A transient hot-wire apparatus with an integrated correlation model is used to measure the thermal conductivities of these nanofluids more conveniently. The pH value and viscosity of the nanofluids are also characterized. The experimental results show that the thermal conductivity increases with an increase of particle volume fraction. The particle size and shape also have effects on this enhancement of thermal conductivity. For TiO2 particles of circle divide 10 nm x 40 nm and circle divide 15 nm dimensions with maximum 5% volume fraction, the enhancement is observed to be nearly 33% and close to 30%, respectively over the base fluid. For 5% volumetric loading of rod-shape TiO2 nanoparticles of circle divide 10 nm x 40 nm in deionized water, this enhancement is found to be 12% higher than that predicted by the Hamilton-Crosser model [I & EC Fundamentals 1 (1962) 187]. However, with the same volumetric loading, the maximum enhancement is determined to be about 16% higher than that predicted by the Bruggeman model [Y. Ding, D. Wen, R.A. Williams, in: Proceedings of 6th International Symposium on Heat Transfer, Beijing, 2004, pp. 66-76] for TiO2 nanoparticles of circle divide 15 nm in the same base fluid of deionized water. The measurement error is estimated to be within 2%. (c) 2005 Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available