4.6 Article

Interleukin-15 increases effector memory CD8+ T cells and NK cells in simian immunodeficiency virus-infected macaques

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 79, Issue 8, Pages 4877-4885

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.79.8.4877-4885.2005

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [R24 RR016988] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI46719, R01 AI046719, N01AI15451, R01 AI052005, AI52005] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interleukin-15 (IL-15) in vitro treatment of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals specifically enhances the function and survival of HIV-specific CD8(+) T cells, while in vivo IL-15 treatment of mice preferentially expands memory CD8(+) T cells. In this study, we investigated the in vivo effect of IL-15 treatment in 9 SIVmac251-infected cynomolgus macaques (low dose of IL-15, 10 mu g/kg of body weight, n = 3; high dose of IL-15, 100 mu g/kg, n = 3; control [saline], n = 3; dose administered twice weekly for 4 weeks). IL-15 treatment induced a nearly threefold increase in peripheral blood CD8(+)CD3(-) NK cells. Furthermore, CD8(+) T-cell numbers increased more than twofold, mainly due to an increase in the CD45RA(-)CD62L(-) and CD45RA(+)CD62L(-) effector memory CD8(+) T cells. Expression of Ki-67 in the CD8(+) T cells indicated expansion of CD8(+) T cells and not redistribution. IL-15 did not affect CD4(+) T-cell, B-cell, and CD14(+) macrophage numbers. No statistically significant differences in changes from baseline in the viral load were observed when control-, low-dose-, and high-dose-treated animals were compared. No clinical adverse effects were observed in any of the animals studied. The selective expansion of effector memory CD8(+) T cells and NK cells by IL-15 further supports IL-15's possible therapeutic use in viral infections such as HIV infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available