4.7 Article

A mathematical model for evaluation of maternal cell contamination in cultured cells from spontaneous abortions: significance for cytogenetic analysis of prenatal selection factors

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 83, Issue 4, Pages 964-972

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.12.009

Keywords

chromosomal abnormalities; long-term cell cultures; maternal cell contamination; mathematical model; sex ratio; spontaneous abortions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To develop a mathematical model for more precise estimation of the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities and the sex ratio among spontaneous abortions masked by maternal cell contamination. Design: Retrospective analysis. Setting: Academic medical center. Patient(s): One hundred twelve samples of spontaneous abortion with a 46,XX karyotype and 97 parents with aborted embryos. Intervention(s): The presence of Y chromosome DNA in native tissues of 46,XX spontaneous abortions was detected by amelogenin locus analysis. Detection of aneuploidies in noncultured tissues of 46,XX abortions was performed by microsatellite DNA analysis and confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Main Outcome Measure(s): Accuracy of cytogenetic evaluation of spontaneous abortions. Result(s): Y chromosome DNA was revealed in 16% of the embryos with a 46,XX karyotype. According to the mathematical model proposed, the frequency of chromosomal abnormalities in a sample of 478 abortions increased from 54.6% to 60.3%, and the sex ratio in embryos with normal karyotype changed from 0.66 to 1.02. The experimental validation of the model has shown that the observed and expected incidences of chromosomal abnormalities in 46,XX abortions were in good agreement. Conclusion(s): Maternal cell contamination clearly affects the incidence of registered chromosomal abnormalities and the sex ratio in spontaneous abortions. Correction for maternal cell contamination should be taken into account before invoking biological explanations of sex ratio bias and might be useful to include in diagnostic reporting. (c) 2005 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available