4.6 Article

RASS-SDSS galaxy cluster survey -: III.: Scaling relations of galaxy clusters

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 433, Issue 2, Pages 431-445

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041915

Keywords

X-rays : galaxies : clusters; surveys

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We use the RASS-SDSS galaxy cluster sample to compare the quality of optical and X-ray luminosities as predictors of other cluster properties such as their masses, temperatures, and velocity dispersions. We use the SDSS spectroscopic data to estimate the velocity dispersions and the virial masses of a subsample of 69 clusters within r(500) and r(200). The ASCA temperature of the intra-cluster medium, T-X, is retrieved from the literature for a subsample of 49 clusters. For this subsample we estimate the cluster masses also by using the mass-temperature relation. We show that the optical luminosity, L-op, correlates with the cluster mass much better than the X-ray luminosity, L-X. L-op can be used to estimate the cluster mass with an accuracy of 40% while L-X can predict the mass only with a 55% accuracy. We show that correcting L-X for the effect of a cool core at the center of a cluster lowers the scatter of the L-X - M relation only by 3%. We find that the scatter observed in the L-op - L-X relation is determined by the scatter of the L-X - M relation. The mass-to-light ratio in the SDSS i band clearly increases with the cluster mass with a slope 0.2 +/- 0.08. The optical and X-ray luminosities correlate in an excellent way with both T-X and sigma(V) with an orthogonal scatter of 20% in both relations. Moreover, L-op and L-X can predict variables with the same accuracy both. We conclude that the cluster optical luminosity is a key cluster parameter since it can give important information about fundamental cluster properties such as the mass, the velocity dispersion, and the temperature of the intra-cluster medium.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available