4.7 Article

Pre- and postoperative immunonutrition in patients undergoing liver transplantation: a pilot study of safety and efficacy

Journal

CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 288-296

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.11.007

Keywords

liver disease; fish oil; arginine; body composition; nutritional status

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Et aims: Malnutrition is common in patients with end-stage liver disease and is a risk factor for post-transplant morbidity. this study was to assess the safety of an immune-enhancing diet in patients undergoing liver transplantation and to investigate its effects on nutritional status. Methods: Fifteen consecutive patients received oral Impact (0.6 l/d) for a median 54 (range 10-168)d pre-transptant and enteral Impact was started early after transplant. Total body protein was measured prior to commencing supplemental Impact, immediately prior to transplant and 10, 15, 30, 90, and 180 days post-transplant. The results were compared with those from 17 patients who received standard nutritional intervention. Results: All study patients tolerated Impact pre- and postoperatively and there were no safety concerns. Over the preoperative period total body protein increased significantly (P = 0,017). In 7 patients followed for 6 months post-transplant, a significant (P = 0.026) loss of body protein occurred over the first 15 postoperative days which was regained by 6 months. In the patients who did not receive Impact, body protein did not change preoperativety and the toss after surgery was not regained. Infectious complications occurred in 5/15 (33%) Impact patients and 12/17 (71%) non-Impact patients (P = 0.074). Conclusions: In patients with end-stage liver disease, our results suggest the possibility that Impact may have a role in improving preoperative nutritional status, hastening recovery after transplant, and reducing postoperative infectious complications. These potential benefits need to be confirmed in a randomised controlled trial. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available