4.4 Article

Hydration status and cardiovascular function: effects of hydration enhancement on cardiovascular function at rest and during psychological stress

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages 81-91

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2004.10.003

Keywords

hydration status; cardiovascular reactivity; stress

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the effects of a 3-day enhanced hydration regimen on resting cardiac function and reactivity to acute stress. Healthy volunteers (14 male, 14 female) were assigned to one of two groups: Enhanced Hydration and Normal Hydration Group. Participants in the Enhanced Group were given six 1-1 bottles of water and instructed to drink two bottles a day in addition to normal fluid intake for 3 days preceding their laboratory session; no extra water was given to the Normal Group. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV), and total peripheral resistance (TPR) were recorded during a 10-min baseline, 6-inin Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT), 5-min recovery, 5-min intermediate baseline, and 3-min Cold Pressor Test. Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant Hydration Group X Task interaction for DBP during the cold pressor (p < 0.01) with the Enhanced Group exhibiting greater DBP reactivity to cold stress relative to the Normal Group. Analysis revealed significant Hydration Group x Gender interactions for SV and TPR (p < 0.05) at rest and during both the PASAT and Cold Pressor Test. Females in the Enhanced Group displayed higher SV and lower TPR relative to Enhanced Group males, whereas females in the Normal Group displayed lower SV and greater TPR relative to Normal Group males. These results suggest that 3-day hydration enhancement influences blood pressure reactivity in both men and women, and that long-term hydration enhancement is related to resting gender differences in cardiac function. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available