Journal
JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 223-226Publisher
OPULUS PRESS UPPSALA AB
DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2005.tb02359.x
Keywords
community similarity; diversity partition; equivalent number of species; Shannon's entropy
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Question: According to Whittaker's proposal,ecologists have traditionally viewed beta-diversity as the ratio between gamma-diversity and average alpha-diversity. More recently, all alternative way of partitioning diversity has been 'rediscovered' for which beta-diversity is obtained as the difference between diversity and average alpha-diversity. This additive way of partitioning diversity has rapidly become a very popular framework for hierarchical diversity decomposition at various spatial scales. The question for this study is: Can we highlight any relation between these two ways of partitioning diversity, or do these methods really capture different facets of spatial turnover in species composition? Methods: First the properties that a diversity measure should possess for enabling additive decomposition into alpha-, beta-, and gamma-components are reviewed. Next, attention is drawn to the relationships between additive and multiplicative diversity decomposition. Results: It is shown that the additive model is closely related to its multiplicative counterpart through a simple logarithmic transformation. Conclusions: Contrary to the current assumption, both methods for partitioning diversity are not as different as they appear. Hence, the supposed superiority of additive diversity partition over multiplicative diversity decomposition is largely unjustified.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available