4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

CO2 efflux from agricultural soils in Eastern Germany -: comparison of a closed chamber system with eddy covariance measurements

Journal

THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY
Volume 80, Issue 2-4, Pages 105-120

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00704-004-0094-z

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to quantify the effects of temperature and soil water content on soil respiration, during June and July 2002 CO2 soil efflux was measured with a closed chamber (non-steady state, flow through) system in the field. The amount of CO2 emission was highly dependent on the land-use in the observation area, which consisted of meadow soil and brownfield. The CO2 emission from the brownfield ranged from 0.9 to 5.5 mu mol CO2 m(2)s(-1), and that for meadow soil from 1.1 to 12.6 mu mol CO2 m(-2) s(-1). Soil respiration, as a function of soil temperature (T-soil), relative soil water content (RSWC), soil PH, and the soil carbon/nitrogen ratio (C/N), was analysed by a modified closed non-linear regression model. Between 63% and 81% of the variation of soil CO2 emission Could be explained with changes of T-soil RSWC, pH, and C/N for the individual chambers on the brownfield. Subsequent analysis involved a comparison of the soil chamber results with eddy covariance (EC) measurements of one week, and included a footptint analysis to account for the influence of the different land use types on the measurements. For this, EC data ( 143 measurements after quality check) were restricted to those originating from the brownfield area with more than 90% of the flux. For a second comparison, the net ecosystem exchange (NEE) was calculated for different parts of the meadow using the SVAT model PROXEL. Together with the respiration from the brownfield. a weighted average of model NEE was produced using the flux contribution determined by the footprint model. Acceptable agreement (r(2) = 0.69) was found between the modelled data and individual EC measurements, except during situations where the performance of the footprint model was disturbed by internal boundary layer effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available