4.5 Article

Depressive symptoms have an independent, gradient risk for coronary heart disease incidence in a random, population-based sample

Journal

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 316-320

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.08.006

Keywords

coronary heart disease; depression; epidemiology; health surveys; cardiology

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [K23 HL004458, N01 HC025197, R24 HL076857] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: Depression is a risk factor for incident coronary heart disease (CHD), and predicts poor prognosis for patients post-myocardial infarction (MI). Few population-based, prospective studies have tested a gradient risk for depressive symptoms on CHD incidence. METHODS: The sample (n = 1302) was derived from the Nova Scotia Health Survey-1995 (NSHS95), an age- and sex-stratified, random, population-based health survey. All subjects were 45 years or older, free of overt CHD at baseline, and completed the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale. Covariates included age, sex, body mass index, physical activity level, family history of premature CHD, diastolic blood pressure, lipids, smoking, alcohol use, diabetes, and education level. For the 4 years following NSHS95, MI-related hospitalizations (ICD-9-CM code 410) and CHD-related deaths (ICD-9CM codes 410-414) were extracted from the provincial, universal healthcare registry. RESULTS: Fifty-two participants experienced a CHD event. A one standard-deviation increase in CES-D score was associated with a 1.32 hazard risk (confidence interval, 1.01-1.71) of CHD events, controlling for established CHD risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: An independent, gradient association between depression and incident CHD was detected in a population-based sample with complete 4-year CHD data. This evidence supports the value of investigating mechanisms linking depression and CHD. (c) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available