4.6 Article

Detection of bacteraemias during non-surgical root canal treatment

Journal

JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 293-303

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.09.008

Keywords

bacteraemias; endodontics; root canal treatment; PCR; pulsed field gel electrophoresis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Some dental procedures initiate a bacteraemia. In certain compromised patients, this bacteraemia may lead to distant site infections, most notably infective endocarditis. Objective. To investigate whether a detectable bacteraemia. was produced during non-surgical root canal therapy. Methods. Thirty patients receiving non-surgical root canal therapy were studied. Three blood samples were taken per patient: pre-operativety, peri-operatively and post-operativety. In addition, a paper point sample was collected from the root canal. The blood samples were cultured by pour plate and blood bottle methods. The isolated organisms were identified by standard techniques. Blood samples were analysed for the presence of bacterial DNA by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In two cases where the same species of organism was identified in the root canal and the bloodstream, the isolates were typed by pulsed field get electrophoresis (PFGE). Results. By conventional culturing, a detectable bacteraemia was present in 9 (30%) of the 30 patients who had no positive pre-operative control blood sample. In 7 (23.3%) patients, the same species of organism was identified in both the bloodstream and in the paper point sample from the root canal system. Overall, PCR gave tower detection rates compared with conventional culture, with 10 of 90 (11%) of the blood samples displaying bacterial DNA. PFGE typing was undertaken for two pairs of culture isolates from blood and paper points; these were found to be genetically identical. Conclusions. Non-surgical root canal treatment may invoke a detectable bacteraemia. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available