3.8 Article

Factors influencing outcome in intracerebral hematoma: a simple, reliable, and accurate method to grade intracerebral hemorrhage

Journal

SURGICAL NEUROLOGY
Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages 343-348

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2004.06.019

Keywords

intracerebral hemorrhage; outcome; Glasgow outcome scale; hypertension

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a major public health problem. This subset of stroke often coexists with other serious medical problems such as hypertension, diabetes, and obesity. Management of hemorrhagic stroke is controversial and there is no standardized system for assessing presentation and predicting outcome of this disease. We propose a new grading system based on clinical and radiologic factors important in influencing outcome in ICH that can be used by the entire health care team. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of the last 50 patients who presented with hypertensive ICHs to Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in Shreveport during 2001 to 2003. Significant predictors of outcome at 6 months as measured by the Glasgow outcome score (GOS) were determined and a grading system based on clot volume, hydrocephalus on initial computed tomographic scan, and focal neurologic deficit was formulated. Results: Three factors observed to have significant association with GOS were presence of a focal neurologic deficit on initial presentation (P =.003), presence of hydrocephalus on initial computed tomographic scan (P <.0001), and clot volume (P =.003). Patients were scored on these variables as follows: absence of any focal neurologic deficit (1 point); neurologically intact (1 point); absence of hydrocephalus (1 point); and clot volume < 20 mL (3 points), 20 to 50 mL (2 points), and > 50 mL (1 point). The scores were summed to assign an ICH grade to each patient for predicting his GOS at 6 months. Given the nonsignificant difference between a patient's grade and his actual observed GOS (mean difference 0.04, P =.79), as well as their significant correlation (correlation coefficient 0.76, P <.0001), we believe our grading system is useful for predicting a patient's GOS. Conclusion: An accurate and reliable grading scale for ICH is helpful in standardizing the management of ICH, improving communication of patient presentation among health care workers, and predicting outcomes. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available