4.0 Article

Obstetric Conveniences - Elective induction of labor, cesarean birth on demand, and other potentially unnecessary interventions

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERINATAL & NEONATAL NURSING
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 134-144

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00005237-200504000-00010

Keywords

elective cesarean birth; elective induction of labor; labor and birth; obstetrical convenience; patient choice

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Common obstetric interventions are often for convenience rather than for clinical indications. Before proceeding, it should be clear who is the beneficiary of the convenience. The primary healthcare provider must make sure that women and their partners have a full understanding of what is known about the associated risks, benefits, and alternative approaches of the proposed intervention. Thorough and accurate information allows women to choose what is best for them and their infant on the basis of the individual clinical situation. Ideally, this discussion takes place during the prenatal period when there is ample opportunity to ask questions, reflect on the potential implications, and confer with partners and family members. A review of common obstetric interventions is provided. While these interventions often are medically indicated for the well-being of mothers and infants, the evidence supporting their benefits when used electively is controversial. Key words: elective cesarean birth, elective induction of labor, labor and birth, obstetrical convenience, patient choice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available