4.6 Article

Retrovirus restriction by TRIM5α variants from old world and new world primates

Journal

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
Volume 79, Issue 7, Pages 3930-3937

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.79.7.3930-3937.2005

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL54785, P50 HL054785] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI063987, R01 AI063987, P30 AI028691, P030 AI28691] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The TRIM5 alpha proteins of humans and some Old World monkeys have been shown to block infection of particular retroviruses following virus entry into the host cell. Infection of most New World monkey cells by the simian immunodeficiency virus of macaques (SIVmac) is restricted at a similar point. Here we examine the antiretroviral activity of TRIM5 alpha orthologs from humans, apes, Old World monkeys, and New World monkeys. Chimpanzee and orangutan TRIM5 alpha proteins functionally resembled human TRIM5 alpha, potently restricting infection by N-tropic murine leukemia virus (N-MLV) and moderately restricting human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. Notably, TRIM5 alpha proteins from several New World monkey species restricted infection by SIVmac and the SIV of African green monkeys, SIVagm. Spider monkey TRIM5 alpha, which has an expanded B30.2 domain v3 region due to a tandem triplication, potently blocked infection by a range of retroviruses, including SIVmac, SIVagm, HIV-1, and N-MLV. Tandem duplications in the TRIM5 alpha B30.2 domain v1 region of African green monkeys are also associated with broader antiretroviral activity. Thus, variation in TRIM5 alpha proteins among primate species accounts for the observed patterns of postentry restrictions in cells from these animals. The TRIM5 alpha proteins of some monkey species exhibit dramatic lengthening of particular B30.2 variable regions and an expanded range of susceptible retroviruses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available