4.7 Article

Meniscal tear and extrusion are strongly associated with progression of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis as assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging

Journal

ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages 556-563

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2004.023796

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The relation between knee meniscal structural damage and cartilage degradation is plausible but not yet clearly proven. Objectives: To quantitate the cartilage volume changes in knee osteoarthritis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and determine whether meniscal alteration predicts cartilage volume loss over time. Methods: 32 patients meeting ACR criteria for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis were studied. MRI knee acquisitions were done every six months for two years. The cartilage volumes of different knee regions were measured. Three indices of structural change in the medial and lateral menisci were evaluated degeneration, tear, and extrusion-using a semiquantitative scale. Results: 24 patients (75%) had mild to moderate or severe meniscal damage (tear or extrusion) at baseline. A highly significant difference in global cartilage volume loss was observed between severe medial meniscal tear and absence of tear (mean (0), - 10. 1 (2.1)% v -5.1(2.4)%, p=0.002). An even greater difference was found between the medial meniscal changes and medial compartment cartilage volume loss (-14.3 (3.0)% in the presence of severe tear v -6.3 (2.7)% in the absence of tear; p<0.0001). Similarly, a major difference was found between the presence of a medial meniscal extrusion and loss of media] compartment cartilage volume (- 15.4 (4.1)% in the presence of extrusion v -4.5 (1.7)% with no extrusion; p<0.001). Conclusions: Meniscal tear and extrusion appear to be associated with progression of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available