4.6 Article

Neuronal nitric oxide synthase and ischemia-induced neurogenesis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 485-492

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600049

Keywords

bromodeoxyuridine; doublecortin; ischemia; neurogenesis; nitric oxide; nitric oxide synthase

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG21980] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS35965] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitric oxide (NO) influences infarct size after focal cerebral ischemia and also regulates neurogenesis in the adult brain. These observations suggest that therapeutic approaches to stroke that target NO signaling may provide neuroprotection and also enhance brain repair through cell replacement. However, ischemic injury and neurogenesis are both affected differently depending on which isoform of NO synthase is the source of NO. In addition, ischemia itself stimulates neurogenesis, and ischemia-induced neurogenesis may be regulated differently than neurogenesis in nonischemic brain. To determine how neuronal NO synthase affects ischemia-induced neurogenesis, transient focal cerebral ischemia was produced in wild-type mice and in knockout mice lacking neuronal NO synthase, and BrdU incorporation and doublecortin immunoreactivity were measured in the principal neuroproliferative regions of the adult brain. Knockout of neuronal NO synthase reduced infarct size and increased both basal and ischemia-induced neurogenesis, suggesting that NO from this source is an inhibitory regulator of neurogenesis in the ischemic brain. 7-Nitroindazole, an NO synthase inhibitor that preferentially affects the neuronal isoform, also increased neurogenesis in rats when administered by the intracerebroventricular route. Selective inhibition of neuronal NO synthase may have the potential to both reduce infarct size and enhance neurogenesis in stroke.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available