4.7 Article

Striatal and forebrain nuclei volumes: Contribution to motor function and working memory deficits in alcoholism

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 57, Issue 7, Pages 768-776

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.12.012

Keywords

alcoholism; striatum; forebrain; grip strength; working memory

Funding

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [R01 AA012388, AA 12388, AA05965, AA10723] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Striatal structures are involved in dopaminergic alcohol reward mechanisms and aspects of motor control. Basal forebrain structures hold cholinergic mechanisms influencing memory formation, vulnerable to chronic alcoholism; however, alcoholism's effect on volumes of these structures has seldom been considered with in vivo measurement. Methods: We measured bilateral volumes of caudate nucleus, putamen, nucleus accumbens, and medial septal/diagonal band (MS/DB) in 25 men with alcohol dependence and 51 age-matched control men. Six alcoholic subjects bad been drinking recently, and 19 bad been sober. Results: Volumes of caudate and putamen were smaller in the alcoholics than in the control subjects, regardless of length of sobriety. Recent drinkers showed greater deficits in nucleus accumbens than sober alcoholics. Putamen volume was positively correlated with grip strength; MS/DB volume was positively correlated with verbal working memory independently of the negative association between age-standardized MS/DB and age in alcoholics. Conclusions: Caudate and putamen volume deficits occur and endure in chronic alcoholism. Nucleus accumbens might be especially sensitive to recent alcohol exposure. Striatal volumes should be considered in functional imaging studies of alcohol craving that target striatal brain regions. The age-alcohol interaction fir MS/DB volumes is consistent with a cholinergic mechanism for the working memory impairment observed in the alcoholics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available