4.3 Article

Analytical relationships among biosite, bayer, and Roche methods for BNP and NT-proBNP - A preliminary study

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 123, Issue 4, Pages 584-590

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
DOI: 10.1309/F86FVEFDGX06DTUV

Keywords

3-type natriuretic peptide; NT pro-BNP; heart failure

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study determined whether, for patient monitoring, it is feasible to convert B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) results obtained using Triage (BNP, Biosite, San Diego, CA), Centaur (BNP, Bayer Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY), and Elecsys 2010 (N-terminal proBNP; Roche, Indianapolis, IN) assays. Concordance between assays and effects of renal impairment also were assessed. Samples were primarily from emergency center patients. Biosite testing was performed immediately; Bayer and Roche testing was performed later on plasma stored frozen (-30 degrees C). Logistic regression relationships were as follows: Bayer = 0.57 Biosite + 23.1, n = 121, R-2 = 0.85; Roche = 6.09 Biosite - 220.4 + 1,131.6 (if female), n = 131, R-2 = 0.57; and Roche = 15.34 Bayer + 2,400.8, n = 150, R-2 = 0.23. An increased serum creatinine level (>= 2 mg/dL [>= 177 mu mol/L]) influenced the Roche results. We conclude the following from this preliminary study: (1) Results from one method cannot be converted reliably to another using regression relationships. (2) When using manufacturers' cutoff values, concordance between assays was acceptable. (3) Renal impairment affected Roche results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available