4.7 Article

A nomogram that predicts the presence of sentinel node metastasis in melanoma with better discrimination than the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system

Journal

ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages 282-288

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2005.05.016

Keywords

melanoma; sentinel node biopsy; nomogram; prognosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The threshold and indications for sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in patients with melanoma remain somewhat arbitrary. Many variables associated with SLN positivity have previously been identified, including a significant association between the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system and SLN status. We developed a User-friendly nomogram that takes several characteristics into account simultaneously to more accurately predict the presence of SLN metastasis for an individual patient. Methods: A total of 979 patients who underwent successful SLN biopsy for cutaneous melanoma at a single institution between February 1991 and November 2003 were included in the analysis. Predictors were used to develop a nomogram, based on logistic regression analysis, to predict the probability of SLN positivity. A large multi-institutional trial with 310 patients was Used to validate the predictive accuracy of the nomogram compared with the AJCC staging system. Results. The nomogram was developed and found to be accurate and discriminating. The concordance index of the nomogram, a Measure of predictive ability, was .694 when evaluated with the validation dataset. In contrast. the concordance index of the AJCC staging system was lower (.663, P <.001). Conclusions: Using commonly available clinicopathologic information, we developed a nomogram to accurately predict the probability of a positive SLN in patients with melanoma. This tool takes several characteristics into account simultaneously. This model should enable improved patient Counseling and treatment selection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available