4.8 Article

Genetic analysis of the HLA region of Japanese patients with type 1 autoimmune hepatitis

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages 578-584

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2004.12.019

Keywords

autoimmune hepatitis; gene polymorphisms; genetic susceptibility; HLA class II antigens; microsatellite markers; single nucleotide polymorphism; tumor necrosis factor alpha

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: Genetic predisposition to type 1 autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is linked mainly to HLA-class II genes. The aim of this study is to scan the HLA region for additional genes which may contribute to type 1 AIH susceptibility. Methods: We performed association analysis using HLA class I and II alleles and 18 polymorphic microsatellite markers distributed throughout the HLA region. We specifically assessed tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha gene polymorphisms. Results: The frequencies of HLA-DRB1*0405, DRB4 and DQB1*0401 alleles were significantly higher in AIH patients. The association study revealed the presence of three segments in the HLA region showing significantly low P (Pc) values. The first segment was located around the HLA-DR/-DQ subregion, the second was around the HLA-B54 allele, and the third was around two microsatellites near the TNF gene cluster. However, stratification analysis for the effect of DRB1*0405 eliminated association of the latter two segments. Haplotype D of the TNF-alpha promoter gene polymorphisms was weakly associated with susceptibility, but was found to be not significant after stratification analysis. Conclusions: The most influential gene on type 1 AIH pathogenesis in Japanese is the HLA-DRB1. Other genes in the HLA region, including TNF-alpha, have little or no association with type 1 AIH susceptibility. (C) 2005 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available