4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Energy and carbon dioxide (CO2) balance of logging residues as alternative energy resources:: system analysis based on the method of a life cycle inventory (LCI) analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 125-134

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s10310-004-0126-7

Keywords

bioenergy; carbon dioxide (CO2) emission; energy balance; life cycle inventory (LCI) analysis; logging residue

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using the method of a life cycle inventory (LCI) analysis, the energy balance and the carbon dioxide (CO2) emission of logging residues from Japanese conventional forestry as alternative energy resources were analyzed over the entire life cycle of the residues. The fuel consumption for forestry machines was measured in field experiments for harvesting and transporting logging residues at forestry operating sites in Japan. In addition, a total audit of energy consumption was undertaken. It involved an assessment of materials, construction, and the repair and maintenance of forestry machines as well as the costs associated. with an energy-conversion plant. As a result, the ratio of energy output to input was calculated to be 5.69, indicating that the system examined in this study could be feasible as an energy production system. The CO2 emission per MWh(e) (e: electricity) of the biomass-fired power generation plant was calculated to be 61.8 kgCO(2)/MWh(c), while that of coal-fired power generation plants in Japan is 960 kgCO(2)/MWh(e). Therefore, the reduction in the amount of CO, emission that would result from replacing coal with biomass for power generation by as much as 3.0 million dry-t/year of logging residues in Japan was estimated to be 1.66 million tCO(2)/year, corresponding to 0.142% of the national CO2 emission. This study provides evidence that Japan could reduce its domestic CO2 emission by using logging residues as alternative energy resources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available