4.1 Article

Pre- and intraoperative predictive factors of facial palsy in vestibular schwannoma surgery

Journal

ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA
Volume 125, Issue 4, Pages 363-369

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00016480410025216

Keywords

facial nerve function; predictive factors; vestibular schwannoma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conclusions. These results support previous ones with regard to FN risk factors in VS surgery. However, they also provide new preoperative factors that influence postoperative FN function, such as clinical symptoms, the nature of the surgical procedure ( use of laser) and ABR results. Objective. To determine pre- and perioperative factors influencing facial nerve ( FN) outcome in vestibular schwannoma ( VS) surgery. Material and methods. A total of 424 patients undergoing VS surgery were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the existence or absence of a FN palsy during the 8 days following surgery ( Groups 1 and 2, respectively). Various parameters were evaluated preoperatively as follows. Quantitative parameters: age; duration of clinical symptoms; pure-tone audiometry ( PTA) results; speech reception threshold; speech discrimination score; auditory brainstem response ( ABR) results; and transient-evoked otoacoustic emission amplitude. Qualitative parameters: gender; side of the tumor; angle between the tumor and the internal auditory canal (VS/IAC angle) <= or > 30 degrees; MRI aspect ( n = 269); surgical approach; ease of the surgical procedure, the use or non-use of laser dissection; and the histological Antoni's type of the tumor. Results. Pre- and perioperative factors that differed significantly between Groups 1 and 2 were as follows. Quantitative factors: tinnitus duration was longer and PTA and ABR results were worse in Group 1. Qualitative factors: heterogenous/cystic MRI aspect, use of retrosisgmoid and middle fossa approaches, easy surgical procedure, dissection without laser and Antoni's type A were more frequently found in Group 1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available