3.8 Article Proceedings Paper

Heritability of clinical tail-biting and its relation to performance traits

Journal

LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE
Volume 93, Issue 1, Pages 87-94

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.11.009

Keywords

pig; behaviour; tail-biting; heritability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clinical tail-biters were identified over a 12-month period at a commercial nucleus pig-breeding farm that had a history of tail-biting problems. The breed, gender, and relative size of the tail-biters were recorded. Using pedigree data for all the pigs on the farm at the time of observations, the heritability of the tail-biting behaviour was estimated for purebred Large White (LW) and Landrace (LR) pigs. The incidence of tail-biting was 2.8% for Large White and 3.5% for Landrace (breed effects, P < 0.10). Tail-biting was found to be heritable in Landrace (h(2)=0.05 +/- 0.02, P < 0.05 as a 0-1 trait, equivalent to h(2)=0.27 as a continuous trait), but not heritable in Large White pigs (h(2)=0.00 +/- 0.00, as a 0-1 trait). In the Landrace population, tail-biting was unfavourably genetically correlated with leanness [lean tissue growth rate (LTGR; r(g)=0.27, P < 0.05), and back fat (BF) thickness at 90 kg (r(g)=-0.28, P < 0.05)]. It is concluded that past selection for desirable production traits may have resulted in increased predisposition to exhibit tail-biting behaviour. From the correlations and covariance matrix reported, it would be possible to develop a selection index to reduce the predisposition to exhibit tail-biting behaviour through selective breeding. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available