4.5 Article

Reliability and validity of the combined heart rate and movement sensor Actiheart

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages 561-570

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602118

Keywords

physical activity; heart rate variability; accelerometer; movement; walking; running; epidemiology; energy expenditure monitoring

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate quantification of physical activity energy expenditure is a key part of the effort to understand disorders of energy metabolism. The Actiheart, a combined heart rate (HR) and movement sensor, is designed to assess physical activity in populations. Objective: To examine aspects of Actiheart reliability and validity in mechanical settings and during walking and running. Methods: In eight Actiheart units, technical reliability ( coefficients of variation, CV) and validity for movement were assessed with sinusoid accelerations (0.1-20 m/s(2)) and for HR by simulated R-wave impulses (25-250 bpm). Agreement between Actiheart and ECG was determined during rest and treadmill locomotion (3.2-12.1 km/h). Walking and running intensity (in J/min/kg) was assessed with indirect calorimetry in 11 men and nine women (26-50y, 20-29 kg/m(2)) and modelled from movement, HR, and movement+HR by multiple linear regression, adjusting for sex. Results: Median intrainstrument CV was 0.5 and 0.03% for movement and HR, respectively. Corresponding interinstrument CV values were 5.7 and 0.03% with some evidence of heteroscedasticity for movement. The linear relationship between movement and acceleration was strong (R-2=0.99, P<0.001). Simulated R-waves were detected within 1 bpm from 30 to 250 bpm. The 95% limits of agreement between Actiheart and ECG were -4.2 to 4.3 bpm. Correlations with intensity were generally high (R-2>40.84, P<0.001) but significantly highest when combining HR and movement (SEE<1 MET). Conclusions: The Actiheart is technically reliable and valid. Walking and running intensity may be estimated accurately but further studies are needed to assess validity in other activities and during free-living. Sponsorship: The study received financial support from the Wellcome Trust and SB was supported by a scholarship from Unilever, UK.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available