4.1 Article

DNA damage in lymphocytes of benzene exposed workers correlates with trans,trans-muconic acids and breath benzene levels

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2004.12.011

Keywords

benzene; comet assay; DNA damage; t,t-MA; lymphocytes; phenol

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Benzene causes man), kinds of blood disorders in workers employed in many different environments. These diseases include myelodisplastic syndrome and acute and chronic myelocytic leukemia. In the present study, five occupational work places, including six industrial process types, namely, printing, shoe-making, methylene di-aniline (MDA), nitrobenzene, carbomer, and benzene production were selected, and the levels of breath benzene, and trans,trans-muconic acids (t,t-MA) and phenol in urine were evaluated. as well as hematological changes and lymphocyte DNA damage. The concentration of benzene in breath was 41 less than 3 ppm in the workplaces, and benzene exposure was found to be higher in work places where benzene is used, than in those where benzene is produced. At low levels of benzene exposure, urinary tt-MA correlated strongly with benzene in air. Highest Olive tail moments were found in workers producing carbomer. Levels of breathzone benzene were found to be strongly correlated with Olive tail moment values in the lymphocytes of workers, but not with hematological data in the six workplaces types. In conclusion, the highest benzene exposures found occurred in workers at a company, which utilized benzene in the production of carbomer. In terms of low levels of exposure to benzene, urinary t.t-MA and DNA damage exhibited a strong correlation with breath benzene, but not with hematological data. We conclude that breath benzene, tt-MA and lymphocytic DNA damage are satisfactory biomonitoring markers with respect to benzene exposure in the workplace. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available