4.6 Article

Comparisons of aerosol optical depth and surface shortwave irradiance and their effect on the aerosol surface radiative forcing estimation

Journal

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
Volume 110, Issue D7, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2004JD004989

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Column aerosol optical depth (AOD) and surface shortwave irradiance (SSI) measurements relevant to computation of the aerosol surface radiative forcing (DF) and forcing efficiency (beta) were taken as part of Aerosol Characterization Experiment-Asia (ACE-Asia) at the Gosan surface site in Korea in April 2001. We compare the AOD and SSI derived from three different types of Sun photometers and three sets of radiometers. We also estimate the Delta F and beta b using two methods and quantify the observational uncertainties of these parameters. A comparison of the AOD at 500 nm shows that the three Sun photometers generally agreed within 0.014 (mean), 0.0142 (bias), and 0.0298 (root mean square) for coincident observations. Over the course of the comparison, the mean differences between the SSI measurements were 1.6, 11.7, and 10.1 Wm(-2) for direct, diffuse and global irradiances, respectively. However, for both the AOD and the SSI comparisons, relatively high instantaneous differences between the instruments were apparent on days with heavy dust at the surface. The mean beta and associated deviations, which were estimated by the combinations of different instrument-derived AODs and SSIs, for simultaneous observation data at a 60 degrees solar zenith angle are -79.50 +/- 3.92 and -82.57 +/- 5.70 Wm(-2)/tau(500) for global(shaded) (sum of direct and diffuse irradiances) and global(unshaded) (measured by the unshaded pyranometer) irradiances, respectively. The uncertainties in beta associated with uncertainties in the AOD and SSI ( in parentheses) for globalshaded and globalunshaded irradiance are about 8.6% and 3.2% (10.7%), respectively. A 2% difference between the measured global irradiances for a given 9 days was translated into an uncertainty of 19% in Delta F. This difference in Delta F between instruments caused a 14% deviation in beta.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available