4.4 Article

On the validity of the quasi-steady state approximation of bimolecular reactions in solution

Journal

JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY
Volume 233, Issue 3, Pages 343-350

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.10.013

Keywords

Smoluchowski theory; enzyme kinetics; time-scale analysis; stiff equations

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 60407, HL 67246] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM/HL 49039] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two-step binding kinetics are extensively used to study the relative importance of diffusion in biochemical reactions. Classical analysis of this problem assumes ad hoc that the encounter complex is at quasi-steady state (QSS). Using scaling arguments we derive a criterion for the validity of this assumption in the limit of irreversible product formation. We find that the QSS approximation (QSSA) of two-step binding is only valid if the total ligand and receptor concentrations are much smaller than (k(2) + k(-1))/k(1), where k(1) and k(-1) are, respectively, the forward and reverse diffusion encounter rate constants and k(2) is the chemical association rate constant. This criterion can be shown to imply that the average time between encounters is much longer than the half-life of the encounter complex and also guarantees that the concentration of the encounter complex is negligible compared to the reactant and product concentrations. Numerical examples of irreversible and reversible cases corroborate our analysis and illustrate that the QSS may be invalid even if k(-2) much less than k(2). Our analysis of the irreversible case is shown to carry through to the more rigorous framework of the Smoluchowski theory of diffusion-controlled reactions. This work underscores the need for exercising greater caution in invoking the QSSA. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available