4.7 Article

Molecular changes in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer: Relationship between estrogen receptor, HER-2, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages 2469-2476

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.172

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P50 CA58183] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To evaluate growth factor receptor cross talk with the estrogen receptor (ER) in paired clinical breast cancer specimens and in a xenograft model before tamoxifen and at tumor progression as a possible mechanism for tamoxifen resistance. Methods Specimen pairs from 39 patients were tissue arrayed and stained for ER, progesterone receptor (PgR), Bcl-2, c-ErbB2 (HER-2), and phosphorylated (p) p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), p-ERK1/2 MAPK, and p-Akt. Xenograft MCF-7 tumors before and after tamoxifen resistance were assessed for levels of p-p38. Results Pretreatment, there were strong correlations between ER, PgR, and Bcl-2, and an inverse correlation between ER and HER-2. These correlations were lost in the tamoxifen-resistant tumors and replaced by strong correlations between ER and p-p38 and p-ERK. ER expression was lost in 17% of resistant tumors. Three (11%) of the 26 tumors originally negative for HER-2 became amplified and/or overexpressed at resistance. All ER-positive tumors that overexpressed HER-2 originally or at resistance expressed high levels of p-p38. In the pretreatment and tamoxifen-resistant specimens, there were strong correlations between p-p38 and p-ERK. In the tamoxifen-resistant xenograft tumors, like the clinical samples, there was a striking increase in p-p38. Conclusion The molecular pathways driving tumor growth can change as the tumor progresses. Crosstalk between ER, HER-2, p38, and ERK may contribute to tamoxifen resistance and may provide molecular targets to overcome this resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available