Journal
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
Volume 535, Issue 1-2, Pages 243-250Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2004.12.002
Keywords
GC-MS; hydroxy polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (OH-PAHs); stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE); thermal desorption (TD); water sample
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) using a 10 mm-long stir bar coated with 24 mu l of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) in combination with the thermal desorption technique and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was used for determining hydroxy polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (OH-PAHs), particularly mono and diOH-PAHs having two- to four-ring structures, in water samples. To improve the recovery for OH-PAHs, in situ derivatization with acetic anhydride was applied prior to SB SE. The optimal conditions for a 10 ml water sample were attained with the addition of 100 mg of sodium hydrogen carbonate, followed by the addition of 20 mu l of acetic anhydride and extraction for 360 min. In the selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode, the limits of detection were found to range from 0.27 ng l(-1) for 2-hydroxynaphthalene (as 2-hydroxynaphthalene acetate) to 25 ng l(-1) for 1,4-dihydroxynaphthalene (as 1,4-naphthoquinone) (S/N = 3). The low total recovery (< 50%) of the entire procedure was mainly due to the low extraction efficiency of acetyl derivatives from water to PDMS, while the in situ derivatization step achieved more than 88% efficiency. Nine OH-PAHs, such as 1,4-naphthoquinone, 2-hydroxynaphthalene, 2,3-dihydroxynaphthalene, 1,5-dihydroxynaphthalene, 1,3-dihydroxynaphthalene, 1,6-dihydroxynaphthalene, 2,6-dihydroxynaphthalene, 2,7-dihydroxynaphthalene, and 9-hydroxyphenanthrene, were detected in environmental samples under the optimal conditions. The detection of OH-PAHs in environmental water samples has not been reported so far. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available