4.8 Article

Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 represses p53-mediated DNA repair and transcriptional activity

Journal

ONCOGENE
Volume 24, Issue 16, Pages 2635-2646

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208319

Keywords

p53; Epstein-Barr virus LMP1; DNA repair

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), a viral oncogene, is essential for transformation of resting B cells by the virus. We previously demonstrated that LMP1 could repress DNA repair in p53-wild-type and p53-deficient human epithelial cells. In this study, using a host cell reactivation (HCR) assay, we demonstrated that p53-enhanced DNA repair was repressed by LMP1 in p53-deficient cells. Moreover, we found that LMP1 was able to repress p53-dependent transcriptional activity. Regarding the mechanisms of p53 repression by LMP1, we found that LMP1 did not inhibit p53 function through direct interaction, by promoting protein degradation or reducing its DNA-binding ability. Using chimeric proteins in the reporter assay, we demonstrated that LMP1 inhibited p53 transactivation by influencing the N-terminal transactivation domain of p53. Subsequent experiments using various LMP1 deletion mutants indicated that a C-terminus-activating region of LMP1, CTAR1 or CTAR2, is responsible for the repression of p53-mediated DNA repair and p53-dependent transcription, which is correlated with the region responsible for NF-kappa B activation. Furthermore, blockage of NF-kappa B signalling by I kappa B-Delta N was shown to abolish the repression of p53 by LMP1, suggesting that LMP1 likely repressed p53 function through the NF-kappa B pathway. Based on these results, we propose that inhibition of p53-dependent transcriptional activity and DNA repair by LMP1 results in the loss of p53 activity for maintaining genomic stability, which may contribute to the oncogenesis of LMP1 in human epithelial cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available