4.7 Article

Kissing complex RNAs mediate interaction between the Fragile-X mental retardation protein KH2 domain and brain polyribosomes

Journal

GENES & DEVELOPMENT
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages 903-918

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gad.1276805

Keywords

Fragile-X mental retardation; FMRP; polyribosome; loop-loop pseudoknot; kissing complex; RNA; KH domain

Funding

  1. NHGRI NIH HHS [R01 HG01363, R01 HG001363] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD040647, R01 HD40647] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM007739, GM07739] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS040955, R01 NS34389, NS40955, R01 NS034389] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fragile-X mental retardation is caused by loss of function of a single gene encoding the Fragile-X mental retardation protein, FMRP, an RNA-binding protein that harbors two KH-type and one RGG-type RNA-binding domains. Previous studies identified intramolecular G-quartet RNAs as high-affinity targets for the RGG box, but the relationship of RNA binding to FMRP function and mental retardation remains unclear. One severely affected patient harbors a missense mutation (I304N) within the second KH domain (KH2), and some evidence suggests this domain may be involved in the proposed role of FMRP in translational regulation. We now identify the RNA target for the KH2 domain as a sequence-specific element within a complex tertiary structure termed the FMRP kissing complex. We demonstrate that the association of FMRP with brain polyribosomes is abrogated by competition with the FMRP kissing complex RNA, but not by high-affinity G-quartet RNAs. We conclude that mental retardation associated with the 1304N mutation, and likely the Fragile-X syndrome more generally, may relate to a crucial role for RNAs harboring the kissing complex motif as targets for FMRP translational regulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available