4.7 Article

The critical role of hematopoietic cells in lipopolysaccharide-induced airway inflammation

Journal

Publisher

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200407-953OC

Keywords

innate immunity; lipopolysaccharide; macrophage; neutrophil; toll-like receptor

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL74538] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI-51445] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES11375, ES07498, ES7031, ES011961, ES12717, ES12496] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rapid and selective recruitment of neutrophils into the airspace in response to LPS facilitates the clearance of bacterial pathogens. However, neutrophil infiltration can also participate in the development and progression of environmental airway disease. Previous data have revealed that Toll-like receptor 4 (tlr4) is required for neutrophil recruitment to the lung after either inhaled or systemically administrated LPS from Escherichia coli. Although many cell types express tlr4, endothelial cell expression of tlr4 is specifically required to sequester neutrophils in the lung in response to systemic endotoxin. To identify the cell types requiring trl4 expression for neutrophil recruitment after inhaled LPS, we generated chimeric mice separately expressing tlr4 on either hematopoietic cells or on structural lung cells. Neutrophil recruitment into the airspace was completely restored in tlr4-deficient mice receiving wild-type bone marrow. By contrast, wild-type animals receiving tlr4-deficient marrow had dramatically reduced neutrophil recruitment. Moreover, adoptive transfer of wild-type alveolar macrophages also restored the ability of tlr4-deficient recipient mice to recruit neutrophils to the lung. These data demonstrate the critical role of hematopoietic cells and alveolar macrophages in initiating LPS-induced neutrophil recruitment from the vascular space to the airspace.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available