4.4 Article

The N-terminal Pro-BNP investigation of dyspnea in the emergency department (PRIDE) study

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 95, Issue 8, Pages 948-954

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.12.032

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The utility of aminoterminal pro-brain natriuretic pepticle (NT-proBNP) testing in the emergency department to rule out acute congestive heart failure (CHF) and the optimal cutpoints for this use are not established. We conducted a prospective study of 600 patients who presented in the emergency department with dyspnea. The clinical diagnosis of acute CHF was determined by study physicians who were blinded to NT-proBNP results. The primary end point was a comparison of NT-proBNP results with the clinical assessment of the managing physician for identifying acute CHF. The median NT-proBNP level among 209 patients (35%) who had acute CHF was 4,054 versus 131 pg/ml among 390 patients (65%) who did not (p < 0.001). NT-proBNP at cutpoints of > 450 pg/ml for pallients < 50 years of age and > 900 pg/ml for patients 50 years of age were highly sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of acute CHF (p < 0.001). An NT-proBNP level < 300 pg/ml was optimal for ruling out acute CHF, With a negative predictive value of. 99%. Increased NT-proBNP was the strongest independent predictor of a final diagnosis of acute CHF(odds ratio 44, 95% confidence interval 21.0 to 91.0, p < 0.0001). NT-proBNP testing alone was superior to clinical judgment alone for diagnosing acute CHF (p = 0.006); NT-proBNP plus clinical judgment was superior to NT-proBNP or clinical judgment alone. NT-proBNP measurement is a valuable addition to standard clinical assessment for the identification and exclusion of acute CHIF in the emergency department setting. (c) 2005 by Excerpta Medica Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available