4.6 Article

Leukotriene B4 receptor-1 is essential for allergen-mediated recruitment of CD8+ T cells and airway hyperresponsiveness

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 174, Issue 8, Pages 4979-4984

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.8.4979

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01 HL036577, HL61005, P01 HL036577-21A15977, HL36577] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI42246] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies in both human and rodents have indicated that in addition to CD4(+) T cells, CD8(+) T cells play an important role in allergic inflammation. We previously demonstrated that allergen-sensitized and -challenged CD8-deficient (CD8(-/-)) mice develop significantly lower airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), eosinophilic inflammation, and IL-13 levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid compared with wild-type mice, and that all these responses were restored by adoptive transfer of in vivo-primed CD8(+) T cells or in vitro-generated effector CD8(+) T cells (T-EFF). Recently, leukotriene B4 and its high affinity receptor, BLT1, have been shown to mediate in vitro-generated T-EEF recruitment into inflamed tissues. In this study we investigated whether BLT1 is essential for the development of CD8(+) T cell-mediated allergic AHR and inflammation. Adoptive trans fer of in vivo-primed BLT1(+/+), but not BLTI-/-, CD8(+) T cells into sensitized and challenged CD8(-/-) mice restored AHR, eosinophilic inflammation, and IL-13 levels. Moreover, when adoptively transferred into sensitized CD8(-/-) mice, in vitro-generated BLTI+/+, but not BLT1(-/-), T-EFF accumulated in the lung and mediated these altered airway responses to allergen challenge. These data are the first to show both a functional and an essential role for BLT1 in allergen-mediated CD8(+) T-EFF recruitment into the lung and development of AHR and airway inflammation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available