4.7 Article

Successful adoptive transfer and in vivo expansion of human haploidentical NK cells in patients with cancer

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 105, Issue 8, Pages 3051-3057

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2004-07-2974

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01-CA-72669, P01-CA-65493] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [M01-RR00400] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01-HL-55417] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We previously demonstrated that autologous natural killer (NK)-cell therapy after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is safe but does not provide an antitumor effect. We hypothesize that this is due to a lack of NK-cell inhibitory receptor mismatching with autologous tumor cells, which may be overcome by allogeneic NK-cell infusions. Here, we test haploidentical, related-donor NK-cell infusions in a nontransplantation setting to determine safety and in vivo NK-cell expansion. Two lower intensity outpatient immune sup-pressive regimens were tested: (1) lowdose cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone and (2) fluclarabine. A higher intensity inpatient regimen of high-dose cyclophosphamide and fluclarabine (HiCy/Flu) was tested in patients with poorprognosis acute myelold leukemia (AML). All patients received subcutaneous interleukin 2 (IL-2) after infusions. Patients who received lower intensity regimens showed transient persistence but no in vivo expansion of donor cells. In contrast, infusions after the more intense Hi-Cy/Flu resulted in a marked rise in endogenous IL-15, expansion of donor NK cells, and induction of complete hematologic remission in 5 of 19 poor-prognosis patients with AML. These findings suggest that haploidentical NK cells can persist and expand in vivo and may have a role in the treatment of selected malignancies used alone or as an adjunct to HCT. (c) 2005 by The American Society of Hematology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available