4.7 Article

Blood mercury levels and neurobehavioral function

Journal

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 293, Issue 15, Pages 1875-1882

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.15.1875

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [R01 AG19604] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES-07141] Funding Source: Medline
  3. ODCDC CDC HHS [T42/CCT310419] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context Due to its cardiovascular benefits, fish consumption is widely encouraged among older Americans. However, this fast-growing population is at increased risk of cognitive impairment and may be particularly sensitive to methylmercury, a neurotoxicant found in fish. Objective To describe associations of blood mercury levels with neurobehavioral test scores in an urban adult population. Design, Setting, and Participants Cross-sectional analysis to determine the effect of mercury levels on neurobehavior in 474 randomly selected participants in the Baltimore Memory Study, a longitudinal study of cognitive decline involving 1140 Baltimore residents aged 50 to 70 years. We measured total mercury in whole blood samples and used multiple linear regression to examine its associations with neurobehavioral test scores. First-visit data were obtained in 2001-2002. Main Outcome Measures Twenty scores from 12 neurobehavioral tests. Results The median blood mercury level was 2.1 mu g/L (range, 0-16 mu g/L). After adjustment for covariates, increasing blood mercury was associated with worse performance on Rey complex figure delayed recall, a test of visual memory (beta, -0.224; 95% confidence interval, -0.402 to -0.047). However, increasing blood mercury levels were associated with better performance on finger tapping, a test of manual dexterity (beta for dominant hand, 0.351; 95% confidence interval, 0.017-0.686). Conclusion Overall, the data do not provide strong evidence that blood mercury levels are associated with worse neurobehavioral performance in this population of older urban adults.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available