4.5 Article

A bacterially expressed particulate hepatitis E vaccine: antigenicity, immunogenicity and protectivity on primates

Journal

VACCINE
Volume 23, Issue 22, Pages 2893-2901

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.11.064

Keywords

hepatitis E virus; vaccine; particulate; efficacy; pre-clinical

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It was evaluated its antigenicity, immunogenicity and efficacy of a candidate recombinant hepatitis E virus (HEV) vaccine, referred hitherto as HEV 239 vaccine. The vaccine peptide has a 26 amino acids extension from the N terminal of another peptide, E2, of the HEV capsid protein, which has been shown to protect monkeys against HEV infection previously. The vaccine peptide is similar as E2 in that: first, the vaccine peptide migrates predominantly as dimer in SDS-PAGE and it is dissociated into monomers by heating; second, its dimeric form of which predominantly recognized by HEV reactive human serum; and third, it shows the same pattern of reaction as E2 with a panel of eight monoclonal antibodies that had been raised against E2. In contrast to E2, the vaccine peptide aggregates to form particles of 13 nm mean radius, and consequently, it is more than 240 times more immunogenic than E2. Using alum as adjuvant, immunizing dose determined in mice was 80-250 ng for the vaccine and > 60 mu g for E2. Rhesus monkeys twice vaccinated with a 10 mu g or a 20 mu g formulation of this vaccine showed essentially the same antibody response, whereas the response to a 5 mu g formulation was delayed but reached similar antibody levels. All the three vaccine formulations afford complete protection against infection with 10(4) genome equivalent dose of the homologous genotype 1 virus. At higher virus dose of 10(7), the same vaccine formulation partially protected against the infection and completely protected against hepatitis. The efficacy of the vaccine was essentially the same for the homologous genotype 1 virus and heterologous genotype 4 virus. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available